You Will Own Nothing and You Will Be Happy – Author Pedro Trillo. Image created with DALL-E.

The world is undergoing a great reset. In this new world, you will own nothing and be happy. This may sound like a utopia, but it is a new reality that we must face. The old system of capitalism is no longer sustainable. We must find a new way to live and work together.

In the old system, we were told that we needed to work hard to get ahead. But in the new world, there is no need to work hard. The world is already ours. We just need to take responsibility for our own lives and happiness. The great reset will not be easy, but it is worth it. In the new world, we will be able to live a fulfilling and joyful life for the rest of our lives.

We will have access to unlimited resources and abundance in the new world. The new world will be where we can all be our true selves and express our authentic selves.

We will be able to connect on a much deeper level and create relationships that are based on love and respect. We will live in harmony with nature and all of its creatures. We will have the opportunity to explore new frontiers and discover hidden talents and abilities.

In the new world, we will be able to create anything that we can imagine. We will be free to pursue our dreams and live our lives to the fullest. We will be able to create anything we desire and live in complete harmony with nature. There will be no more wars or conflicts, and we will all be able to live in peace and harmony.

The World Economic Forum says that by 2030, you will own nothing and still be happy – what do they mean?

The World Economic Forum has released a report detailing eight predictions for the world by 2030. Among these predictions is the claim that by 2030, you will own nothing, and you will still be happy. The report cites the rise of the sharing economy as one reason people will own less in the future. With platforms like Airbnb and Uber, people are increasingly willing to share their possessions rather than own them outright. The report also predicts that the middle class will shrink as wealth becomes more concentrated among a small number of people.

This could make people less materialistic and more focused on experiences rather than possessions. Finally, the report claims that life savings will no longer be enough to sustain people in retirement, leading to a need for a new way of thinking about work and retirement. Technocracy, or the rule of experts, is one possible solution the report mentions. The Great Reset: You Will Own Nothing, and You Will Be Happy explores the idea of technocracy and its implications for the future of society.

The report outlines that technology will soon render most human labor obsolete and that the world will be governed by a technocratic elite who will manage all aspects of society. It argues that this future is inevitable and will be a good thing for humanity. The book was written by Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.

In 2030 you’ll own nothing and be happy about it – is this possible?

In 2030, you will own nothing and be happy about it. This is the prediction of Danish politician Ida Auken, who believes that shifting to a circular economy will lead to a more optimistic and sustainable way of life. We would rent or share in a circular economy instead of buying new products. For example, instead of buying a new home, we would live in a shared community with access to all the necessary amenities.

Appliances and clothes would be rented instead of purchased, and everything would be designed to be reused or recycled. This would significantly reduce the amount of waste produced and lead to a more sustainable way of living. Auken believes this shift will lead to a more sustainable and equitable world, where we are happier because we own less.

The idea of a circular economy has been around for a while, but it has recently gained traction due to the global environmental crisis. The problem with our current system is that it is unsustainable. We are using resources faster than they can be replaced, producing more waste than ever. In a circular economy, we would use resources more efficiently and produce less waste. This would be a step in the right direction toward solving the global environmental crisis.

The idea of a circular economy has been around for a while, but it has recently gained traction due to the global environmental crisis. The problem with our current system is that it is unsustainable. We are using resources faster than they can be replaced, producing more waste than ever. In a circular economy, we would use resources more efficiently and produce less waste. This would be a step in the right direction toward solving the global environmental crisis.

The World Economic Forum’s Great Reset agenda – what’s the likelihood of it happening?

The World Economic Forum’s Great Reset plan has been very skeptical. Some people believe that it is a grand conspiracy by the global elite to control societies and economies. Others believe that it is a well-intentioned but ultimately unrealistic plan. Either way, the Great Reset would require a massive change in how we live and work. It is doubtful that such a change could be achieved without significant upheaval.

The differences between the European national approaches are too tremendous and entrenched to allow an easy transition to a pan-European system. National interests would have to be subordinated to the interests of the European Union as a whole. Many efficiencies, transparency, and accountability improvements would have to be made, and these could only be achieved if there was a significant amount of political will at all levels.

Therefore, the concept of a pan-European approach to food safety is unlikely to be realized in the near future. However, it is clear that the present system is not working well, and changes are needed. It is equally clear that a new system cannot be imposed from above and that any change must involve the active participation of all who have a stake in food safety.

But to achieve that objective, governments need to adopt a more strategic approach to food safety. They must be much more proactive in dealing with the threats to the food supply and take a more holistic view of the issues involved.

In particular, they should examine ways of strengthening the food safety systems already in place, which, in many cases, are undermined by inadequate resources.

They also need to ensure that these systems are backed up by effective enforcement mechanisms that will enable them to detect and deal with breaches of food safety standards.

Adopting such an approach will require a significant shift in thinking by governments, but it is essential if we build a safer and more secure food supply.

Conclusions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced us to reevaluate our priorities as a society. Climate change, racial unrest, overpopulation, and inequality are all issues that we can no longer ignore.

We must take action to address these problems, or they will only worsen. Climate change is already causing more extreme weather events, and as the world gets warmer, we can expect even more extreme weather in the future. This will impact our food and water supplies and our ability to live comfortably.

Racial unrest is also rising as people of color are increasingly marginalized and disadvantaged. This is especially true in the United States, where minorities are more likely to live in poverty and lack access to education and healthcare. Overpopulation is also putting strain on our resources, as we struggle to provide enough food, water, and shelter for everyone. And inequality is growing as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

These issues are all interconnected, and we must address them together. We can no longer afford to ignore them. The Great Reset is an opportunity for us to reset our priorities and create a better future for all.

In a world turned upside down by the pandemic, the Great Reset offers us a chance to rethink our priorities and create a better future for all. Let’s use this opportunity to build a more sustainable, equitable, and inclusive world. We will own nothing, and we will be happy.

You will own nothing and be happy

• 발행한 날: 2021년 3월 26일

Angelo Valoppi

International Sales & Brand Management

글 4 팔로우

Not my words, these are in fact an extract from the video-prediction that the World Economic Forum (WEF) has recently published and then taken off their website, the clip proposes to act as a crystal ball divining how lives of people around the planet will look like in 2030. Beside the annihilation of private property it foresees drone deliveries of rented goods, the decline of US global dominance, organs printing, a fall in meat consumption and international travels, one billion people been displaced by climate change, a global tax on fossil fuels, the start of a space journey to find alien life and our western values been put under test. Obviously, this is not a prediction but a sales pitch instead. WEF's mission is stated to be "improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas", the possible reasons for exposing their objectives so explicitly through the videoclip above could be to measure reactions and start adapting the public around their ideas. Despite the clumsy "debunks" of some mainstream media what happened was a reformulation of the controversial term "New World Order" that was used several times before by political leaders such as George H.W. Bush, Henry Kissinger in 1994 and lately by UK former prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown among the others, a term that had somehow absorbed negative moral connotates and required rebranding. We are now slowly acclimatising with what WEF named "Great Reset", a proposal to rebuild the global economy in a sustainable way after the current COVID-19 emergency which is seen as an opportunity for shaping a recovery and the future direction of global relationships, economies and priorities. No conspiracy theories involved then, when founder and executive chaiman of WEF Klaus Schwab says that the World Health Organisation (WHO) "is the only organization capable of coordinating a global response to the pandemic" suggesting that in the near future it will, together with the United Nations (UN), replace nation-states in the direction of global governance, it is understood that the project's aims are so transparent such as not to tolerate any dissent, especially when expressed by individual elected governments.

However hard is to detach morally from topics like these, opinions are not the main point here as we better abstract from any 'ism' and look at things from a neutral perspective before choosing or not choosing sides. Along with the abolition of family, countries and nationality, that of private property is one, if not the fundamental, principle of Karl Marx Communist Manifesto. The argument is that bourgeoisie-controlled property represents a social power, not a personal one, common property instead would eliminate its class character challenging bourgeoisie freedom and therefore aiming at eliminating it altogether with other social stratifications. In contemporary times the bourgeoisie is defined as the middle class and upper-middle class, a category of humans that owns a certain cultural and financial capital. Vagueness here is king, as there is no way to decrete the boundaries between a class and the other unless appealing to arbitrary classifications. On top of that, by means of logic, private property simply cannot be eliminated since if owning something corresponds with the power of using it and benefiting from it, then if nobody owns a thing, no one should also use it. The idea of common property while not then allowing masses to use means of production and capital, ought to be understood in this case as a centralised power of equally redistributing them, the idealistic aura at this point begins to fade and starts resembling some political ghosts from the past. Obviously the times are different and history does not necessarily repeat itself, it is just not clear how the new leveling will be achieved and if the "be happy" bit on the clip's introduction ought to be understood as promise to be delivered or an intimation to adjust with. Transnational organisation such as WEF are thriving in the globalised world and the biggest players in the financial arena seem preparing accordingly, at the start of 2021 with 242,000 acres Bill Gates has become the biggest farmland owner in US while Jeff Bezos is also investing heavily on land with 420,000 acres, Liberty Media Chair John Malone topping the global list with 2.2 million acres of ranches and forests. There are two standpoints from which to evaluate this sudden appetite of business moguls which I call Naive and Power angle: the former shows the good intentions of foundations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates towards the promotion of high-yield, sustainable agriculture and the development and proliferation of “super-crops” resistant to climate change and higher-yield dairy cows, the latter has to do with the strenght of owning food-production means in a scenario of global reshaping such as the period we all experiencing right now. In a famous quote Henry Kissinger noticed that "who controls the oil controls the nations, but who controls the food controls the people", the current geoglobal structural changes suggest both a taste for farmland and a decline in oil consumption and price together with an enviromental stigma attached to it. Crude has fallen from a peak of USD 168 in 2008 to USD 61 in 2021 having seen an abyss when in April 2020 collapsed to USD 19, international policy is following suit on the back of enthusiasm around sustainability and the massive switch of capital taking place within the energy sector.

Ultimately, it seems clear that, at least in the West, globalisation is gaining momentum while taking away power from the hands of national governments, traditionally leading industries and probably the middle class in favour respectively of transnational organisations, rising energy players and a handful of whealthy privates. WEF mission of abolishing private property reflects its hunger for global governance assisted simultaneously by similar goals of the sustainability sector, it is left to know whether the public is ready to accept that silently. While talking global communism and universal income few years ago, philosopher Slavoj Žižek said that the ideal state of human beings is indeed one in which someone else from above provides all the necessary in order for them to express their creativity and enjoy leisure. It was probably a subjective consideration after all since we don't need to bother Nietzsche in order to suspect that human nature has also a lot to do with an innate drive for power, owning property is possibly one of the more immediate expressions of it and while history teach us that large scale financial leveling has both practical and ethical problematics, it also reminds us that those attempts are not likely to endure against the evergrowing desires of the masses. Happiness or power, what do you choose?